People v. Davis

35 A.D.3d 690, 824 N.Y.S.2d 915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 A.D.3d 567

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated February 10, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court correctly found that the People had met their burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the facts that supported the defendant’s adjudication as a level three sex offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Graeber, 31 AD3d 517 [2006]; People v Perser, 29 AD3d 767 [2006]; People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364, 364-365 [2006]; cf. People v Thompson, 31 AD3d 409 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining claim is without merit. Goldstein, J.E, Skelos, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 35 A.D.3d 690, 824 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

35 A.D.3d 690 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Davis
26 A.D.3d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Perser
29 A.D.3d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Thompson
31 A.D.3d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Graeber
31 A.D.3d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)