People v. Davis

77 A.D.3d 896, 909 N.Y.S.2d 646
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 A.D.3d 1357

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), dated June 12, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[897]*897The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for a downward departure from his presumptive level three sex offender designation (see People v King, 74 AD3d 1162 [2010]; People v Pietarniello, 53 AD3d 475, 478 [2008]; People v Taylor, 47 AD3d 907 [2008]). The defendant failed to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that there exists a mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act Guidelines that warranted such a departure (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; People v Pietarniello, 53 AD3d 475 [2008]; People v Taylor, 47 AD3d 907 [2008]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 77 A.D.3d 896, 909 N.Y.S.2d 646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

77 A.D.3d 896 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Taylor
47 A.D.3d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Pietarniello
53 A.D.3d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. King
74 A.D.3d 1162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)