People v. Davis
49 A.D.3d 895, 853 N.Y.2d 896
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[896]*896The trial court did not err in finding that the complainant’s statements on a recording of his telephone call to the 911 emergency number were excited utterances and therefore admissible (see People v Johnson, 1 NY3d 302, 306 [2003]; People v Gantt, 48 AD3d 59 [2007]; People v Blackman, 13 AD3d 640, 641 [2004]; People v Prashad, 297 AD2d 352 [2002]; cf. People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 385 [2000]; People v Vasquez, 88 NY2d 561, 579 [1996]). Fisher, J.P., Dillon, McCarthy and Belen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Davis, 49 A.D.3d 895, 853 N.Y.2d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 895 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Spencer
87 A.D.3d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Coad
60 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)