People v. Davis

28 A.D.3d 787, 812 N.Y.S.2d 890
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered January 24, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial because of prosecutorial misconduct during summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, does not require reversal (see People v Ayala, 4 AD3d 480 [2004]).

The defendant’s contentions that his sentencing as a persistent felony offender violated his constitutional rights to notice and a jury trial pursuant to Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), and that the Supreme Court did not comply with the procedural requirements of Penal Law § 70.10 and CPL 400.20 in adjudicating him a persistent felony offender, are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61, 67 [2005], cert denied — US —, 126 S Ct 564 [2005]; People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329, 335 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]; People v Horn, 7 AD3d 638 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 28 A.D.3d 787, 812 N.Y.S.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 787 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crosland
50 A.D.3d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Hearns
33 A.D.3d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)