Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Crosland

People v. Crosland

50 A.D.3d 819, 854 N.Y.S.2d 654
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 8, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.3d 819 (People v. Crosland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Crosland, 50 A.D.3d 819, 854 N.Y.S.2d 654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered June 28, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial because of prosecutorial misconduct is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, does not require reversal (see People v Hearns, 33 AD3d 722 [2006]; People [820]*820v Davis, 28 AD3d 787 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Davis
28 A.D.3d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Hearns
33 A.D.3d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.3d 819, 854 N.Y.S.2d 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crosland-nyappdiv-2008.