People v. Crosland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Crosland

50 A.D.3d 819, 854 N.Y.S.2d 654

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 2008·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered June 28, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial because of prosecutorial misconduct is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, does not require reversal (see People v Hearns, 33 AD3d 722 [2006]; People [820]*820v Davis, 28 AD3d 787 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered June 28, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial because of prosecutorial misconduct is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, does not require reversal (see People v Hearns, 33 AD3d 722 [2006]; People [820]*820v Davis, 28 AD3d 787 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

People v. Crosland, 50 A.D.3d 819, 854 N.Y.S.2d 654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

50 A.D.3d 819 (People v. Crosland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related