People v. Davidson

California Supreme Court

People v. Davidson

5 Cal. 133

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 5 Cal. 133 (People v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davidson, 5 Cal. 133 (Cal. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

Bryan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

[134]*134This cause was tried in the Court of Sessions, for Placer County, upon an indictment charging the defendants with an assault with intent to commit murder, in the first count of the indictment; and in the second count charging the defendant, Kennedy, with aiding and abetting an assault with intent to commit murder, as an accessory. Upon this indictment, the defendant Davidson, having elected to be tried separately, the jury found him guilty of an “ assault with a deadly weapon, with the intention of committing great bodily injury.”

The indictment in charging Davidson and Kennedy with an assault with an intent to commit murder, and afterwards Kennedy with being an accessory, charges but one offepse. Ttie eleventh section of the Act concerning Crimes and Punishments, makes any person aiding or assisting, or advising and encouraging the perpetration of a crime, a principal, and that he or she shall be punished accordingly. Under the law of this State, the accessory is treated as a principal, and, as if the person charged as such had committed the offense. It is not error to charge the defendant as principal and accessory in the same indictment.

The verdict of the Jury which finds the defendant guilty of an “ assault with a deadly weapon, with intent to commit great bodily injury,” is regular, and we deem that it finds the defendant guilty of a public offense. Section 424, of the Act regulating Proceedings in Criminal Cases, provides—that in all cases a person may be found guilty of an offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he may be charged in the indictment.

To find the defendant guilty of an “ assault with intent to commit great bodily injury,” is necessarily included in the charge of an assault with intent to commit murder. We find no error in the record sent up.

The judgment below is therefore affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

[134]*134This cause was tried in the Court of Sessions, for Placer County, upon an indictment charging the defendants with an assault with intent to commit murder, in the first count of the indictment; and in the second count charging the defendant, Kennedy, with aiding and abetting an assault with intent to commit murder, as an accessory. Upon this indictment, the defendant Davidson, having elected to be tried separately, the jury found him guilty of an “ assault with a deadly weapon, with the intention of committing great bodily injury.”

The indictment in charging Davidson and Kennedy with an assault with an intent to commit murder, and afterwards Kennedy with being an accessory, charges but one offepse. Ttie eleventh section of the Act concerning Crimes and Punishments, makes any person aiding or assisting, or advising and encouraging the perpetration of a crime, a principal, and that he or she shall be punished accordingly. Under the law of this State, the accessory is treated as a principal, and, as if the person charged as such had committed the offense. It is not error to charge the defendant as principal and accessory in the same indictment.

The verdict of the Jury which finds the defendant guilty of an “ assault with a deadly weapon, with intent to commit great bodily injury,” is regular, and we deem that it finds the defendant guilty of a public offense. Section 424, of the Act regulating Proceedings in Criminal Cases, provides—that in all cases a person may be found guilty of an offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he may be charged in the indictment.

To find the defendant guilty of an “ assault with intent to commit great bodily injury,” is necessarily included in the charge of an assault with intent to commit murder. We find no error in the record sent up.

The judgment below is therefore affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cal. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davidson-cal-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack