People v. David

2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 52
CourtCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 52 (People v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court Of Oyer And Terminer New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. David, 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 52 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1849).

Opinion

The Judge

charged the jury that the main question was, whether the offense was murder or manslaughter in the second degree. Murder was effecting death with intention to kill. Manslaughter in the second degree was effecting death in a cruel and unusual manner, without an intention to kill.

The only facts in the case from which the jury might infer an intention to Mil, was the returning to the deceased after he was prostrate, and then perpetrating the violence, and Ms having twice said he hoped he had killed Mm, but whether that was merely the ebullition of a drunken man in Ms passion, or the utterance of a premeditated design to effect death, was for the jury to consider, but it would not do for the jury to convict for murder unless they were clearly satisfied there was such premeditated design.

The verdict was, guilty of manslaughter in the second degree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terrill v. State
70 N.W. 356 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-david-nyoytermct-1849.