People v. David
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Giudice, J), rendered January 31, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and unlawful possession of marijuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the verdict convicting him of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, was against the weight of the evidence. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s [1164]*1164opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
65 A.D.3d 1163 (People v. David) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.