People v. Daniels

226 A.D.2d 650, 641 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4295
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Daniels. Read the opinion of the Court — 202 A.D.2d 987

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), rendered March 12, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the charges relating to his possession of controlled substances should have been tried separately from the charges relating to robbery and grand larceny. The evidence presented, including the defendant’s admission at trial, demonstrate that his acts constituted a single criminal endeavor with the same purpose, and were closely related and connected in time and circumstance of commission. Thus, these charges were properly tried together (see, CPL 40.10, 200.20; People v Johnson, 48 NY2d 925; People v Gallishaw, 143 AD2d 198; People v Lawrence, 166 AD2d 164).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Daniels, 226 A.D.2d 650, 641 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 650 (People v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
401 N.E.2d 178 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Gallishaw
143 A.D.2d 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Lawrence
166 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)