People v. Daniels

202 A.D.2d 986, 612 N.Y.S.2d 696
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1994·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[987]*987—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Because he was absent from the Sandoval hearing, defendant was deprived of his right to be present at all material stages of the proceedings against him (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656, 662; People v Hall, 201 AD2d 891). Contrary to the People’s contention, defendant’s presence at the Sandoval hearing would not have been superfluous (see, People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872; People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Petit Larceny.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Law-ton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Daniels, 202 A.D.2d 986, 612 N.Y.S.2d 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 986 (People v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Russin
203 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)