People v. Russin
203 A.D.2d 900, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Because he was absent from the Sandoval hearing, defendant was deprived of his right to be present at all material stages of the proceedings against him (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656, 662; People v Daniels, 202 AD2d 986).
In view of our determination, we do not address defendant’s remaining contentions. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Grand Larceny, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Russin, 203 A.D.2d 900, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
203 A.D.2d 900 (People v. Russin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Dokes
595 N.E.2d 836 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Daniels
202 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)