Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Russin

People v. Russin

203 A.D.2d 900, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 900 (People v. Russin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Russin, 203 A.D.2d 900, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Because he was absent from the Sandoval hearing, defendant was deprived of his right to be present at all material stages of the proceedings against him (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656, 662; People v Daniels, 202 AD2d 986).

In view of our determination, we do not address defendant’s remaining contentions. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Grand Larceny, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dokes
595 N.E.2d 836 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Daniels
202 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 900, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-russin-nyappdiv-1994.