People v. Dalton

2021 NY Slip Op 02257
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 2021
DocketInd No. 289/17 Appeal No. 13583 Case No. 2019-5493
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02257 (People v. Dalton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dalton, 2021 NY Slip Op 02257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Dalton (2021 NY Slip Op 02257)
People v Dalton
2021 NY Slip Op 02257
Decided on April 13, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 13, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Oing, Kennedy, JJ.

Ind No. 289/17 Appeal No. 13583 Case No. 2019-5493

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Theodore Dalton, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Molly Schindler of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Shane Magnetti of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about June 28, 2019, which adjudicated defendant a level three predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors defendant cites were adequately taken into account by the guidelines or are outweighed by defendant's criminal history of three sex offenses, two of which were felonies, and the fact that he committed the underlying offense after having twice been adjudicated a level three offender. The application of the presumptive override for a prior sex offense does not overassess defendant's risk of reoffense.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 13, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dalton
2021 NY Slip Op 02257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 02257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dalton-nyappdiv-2021.