People v. Dalton

217 A.D.2d 587, 629 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7699
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 10, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 217 A.D.2d 587 (People v. Dalton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dalton, 217 A.D.2d 587, 629 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered March 2, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[588]*588Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that the trial court erred by refusing to admit into evidence a tape recording of a 911 telephone call that the defendant placed minutes after the shooting, since the record indicates that he had "the time to reflect and possibly fabricate a story” (People v Wilson, 123 AD2d 457, 458; see, People v Sostre, 51 NY2d 958). Accordingly, the recording was not admissible into evidence as either an excited utterance or a present sense impression.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Altman, Gold-stein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Irizarry
249 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 A.D.2d 587, 629 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dalton-nyappdiv-1995.