People v. Dalton

217 A.D.2d 587, 629 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7699
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 10, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered March 2, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[588]*588Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that the trial court erred by refusing to admit into evidence a tape recording of a 911 telephone call that the defendant placed minutes after the shooting, since the record indicates that he had "the time to reflect and possibly fabricate a story” (People v Wilson, 123 AD2d 457, 458; see, People v Sostre, 51 NY2d 958). Accordingly, the recording was not admissible into evidence as either an excited utterance or a present sense impression.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Altman, Gold-stein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dalton, 217 A.D.2d 587, 629 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

217 A.D.2d 587 (People v. Dalton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Irizarry
249 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)