People v. Irizarry

249 A.D.2d 563, 671 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4563
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Irizarry. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 A.D.2d 483

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J., at trial; O’Dwyer, J., at sentencing), rendered April 15, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s exculpatory statements which he made upon his arrest were made after he had the opportunity to reflect and possibly fabricate (see, People v Dalton, 217 AD2d 587, affd 88 NY2d 561). Accordingly, those statements were not admissible as excited utterances (see, People v Sostre, 51 NY2d 958).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Irizarry, 249 A.D.2d 563, 671 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 563 (People v. Irizarry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vasquez
670 N.E.2d 1328 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Sostre
416 N.E.2d 1038 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Dalton
217 A.D.2d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)