People v. Cureton
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jamil CURETON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The defendant claims that he is being wrongfully detained on a sentence for an offense that occurred in 1995, from which he was paroled and discharged. If the defendant is correct, the proper cause of action would be a complaint for writ of habeas corpus against the Department of Corrections for the illegal detention.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
738 N.W.2d 763 (People v. Cureton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.