People v. Cureton
This text of 738 N.W.2d 762 (People v. Cureton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jamil CURETON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The defendant claims that he is being wrongfully detained on a sentence for an offense that occurred in 1995, from which he was paroled and discharged. If the defendant is correct, the proper cause of action would be a complaint for writ of habeas corpus *763 against the Department of Corrections for the illegal detention.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
738 N.W.2d 762, 2007 WL 2783164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cureton-mich-2007.