People v. Cummings

134 A.D.3d 686, 19 N.Y.S.3d 772
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 2015·No. 2012-03101·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Meyer, J.), dated March 21, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant had previously been convicted of a felony sex crime (see People v Goods, 121 AD3d 660 [2014]; People v Smalls, 120 AD3d 1145 [2014]; People v Carter, 85 AD3d 995 [2011]). Therefore, the defendant was presumptively a level three sex offender pursuant to an automatic override address *687 ing prior felony convictions for sex crimes, irrespective of the points scored on the risk assessment instrument (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 3-4 [2006]; People v Barfield, 115 AD3d 835 [2014]). Further, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s application for a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128 [2011]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cummings, 134 A.D.3d 686, 19 N.Y.S.3d 772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 686 (People v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Long
2018 NY Slip Op 3160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Broadus
142 A.D.3d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)