People v. Cruz

271 A.D.2d 694, 707 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4456
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 A.D.2d 136

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[695]*695fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Irizarry, J.), rendered July 28, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cruz, 271 A.D.2d 694, 707 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

271 A.D.2d 694 (People v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)