People v. Cruz

247 A.D.2d 306, 668 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 A.D.2d 952

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), rendered January 30, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s supplemental instructions were proper. We agree with the court that the prosecution’s case was based on both direct and circumstantial evidence (see, People v Daddona, 81 NY2d 990; People v Cedeno, 175 AD2d 767, lv denied 79 NY2d 854). In any event, the supplemental instructions conveyed the appropriate standards concerning circumstantial evidence (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 442; People v Morris, 36 NY2d 877).

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cruz, 247 A.D.2d 306, 668 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 306 (People v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Morris
334 N.E.2d 10 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Ford
488 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Daddona
615 N.E.2d 1014 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Cedeno
175 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)