People v. Cruz

514 N.E.2d 379, 70 N.Y.2d 733, 519 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18583
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 17, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by41 cases

This text of 514 N.E.2d 379 (People v. Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cruz, 514 N.E.2d 379, 70 N.Y.2d 733, 519 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18583 (N.Y. 1987).

Opinion

[735]*735OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Upon reargument, following remand from the Supreme Court of the United States (see, Cruz v New York, 481 US —, 107 S Ct 1714), the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The Supreme Court having determined that the videotaped statement of codefendant Benjamin Cruz was improperly received in his joint trial with defendant Eulogio Cruz, remitted the matter to this court for further proceedings. We now determine that reception of the evidence was not harmless.

Insofar as the People now contend that the statement was admissible as a declaration against penal interest by Benjamin Cruz, probative of defendant’s guilt, it is sufficient to note that the statement was not offered at trial for that purpose and defendant has had no opportunity to challenge its reliability (see, People v Brensic, 70 NY2d 9).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Alexander taking no part.

Upon reargument, following remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, order reversed and a new trial ordered in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ahmad
225 A.D.2d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Santiago
174 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Jackson
148 Misc. 2d 886 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Forrest
163 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Flores
162 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Biggerstaff
159 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Pena
159 A.D.2d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Graham
158 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Gotti
146 Misc. 2d 793 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Jefferson
156 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Gonzalez
153 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Means
152 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Toro
151 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Latine
151 A.D.2d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Brister
149 A.D.2d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Mistretta
147 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Faust
534 N.E.2d 35 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Garrison
143 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Vargas
143 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Di Nicolantonio
140 A.D.2d 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
514 N.E.2d 379, 70 N.Y.2d 733, 519 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cruz-ny-1987.