People v. Crosby

131 A.D.3d 1179, 16 N.Y.S.3d 764
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2015
Docket2013-09966
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 131 A.D.3d 1179 (People v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Crosby, 131 A.D.3d 1179, 16 N.Y.S.3d 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

—Appeal ? ? by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), imposed October 7, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Finnegan, 112 AD3d 847 [2013]; People v Gil, 109 AD3d 484 [2013]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. Raymond Leach
48 N.E.3d 497 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.D.3d 1179, 16 N.Y.S.3d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crosby-nyappdiv-2015.