People v. Cox

37 A.D.3d 211, 829 N.Y.S.2d 97
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cox. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 A.D.3d 1361

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J), rendered December 1, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion without a hearing (see People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415 [1993]). Although defendant had ample information, with particular reference to the facts recited at arraignment (see People v Long, 36 AD3d 132 [2006] [codefendant’s appeal]), upon which to make a proper suppression motion, his allegations were insufficient to raise a factual dispute requiring a hearing (see People v Roberts, 23 AD3d 245 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 817 [2006]). Defendant’s conclusory claims did not address the People’s allegation that he possessed drugs in the car he was driving, as well as that he acted in concert with his codefendant in other unlawful activity in a store prior to the lawful stop of the car. Concur—Sullivan, J.E, Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cox, 37 A.D.3d 211, 829 N.Y.S.2d 97 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

37 A.D.3d 211 (People v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mendoza
624 N.E.2d 1017 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Roberts
23 A.D.3d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Long
36 A.D.3d 132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)