People v. Cox

252 A.D.2d 978, 674 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8485
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cox. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D.2d 1244

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25 [2]). Defendant contends that a delay of approximately nine months violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Considering the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442), we conclude that the delay was not unreasonable. The nine-month delay was minimal; the charge of possessing sharpened metal and plastic weapons while an inmate at Auburn Correctional Facility was serious; defendant was incarcerated on another conviction and thus there was no pretrial incarceration on this charge; there is no allegation that the defense was impaired by reason of the delay; and a portion of the delay was attributable to defendant’s request for an adjournment. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Contiguglia, J. — Promoting Prison Contraband, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cox, 252 A.D.2d 978, 674 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

252 A.D.2d 978 (People v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Taranovich
335 N.E.2d 303 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)