People v. Cox

245 A.D.2d 462, 666 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14133
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered December 7, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that the court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the defense of justification pursuant to Penal Law §§35.15 and 35.20. The evidence adduced at trial, when viewed in a light most favorable to the defense (see, People v Padgett, 60 NY2d 142; People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299), did not support the defendant’s claim that he shot the victim while the latter was committing or attempting to commit a burglary (see, Penal Law § 35.20; People v Bertone, 213 AD2d 417; see also, People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96).

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021, 1022).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (People v Tate, 200 AD2d 602, 603; People v Miller, 39 NY2d 543). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Joy and Lerner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cox, 245 A.D.2d 462, 666 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 462 (People v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related