People v. Cotto

216 A.D.2d 123, 629 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6608
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 20, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered July 27,1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the denial of his motion to suppress without a hearing is academic since the officer who recovered the property sought to be suppressed was precluded from testifying about such property pursuant to a Rosario sanction lodged against the People. Moreover, after the court’s initial ruling, defendant failed to renew his motion on the grounds now asserted on appeal and, therefore, failed to preserve the issue for this Court’s review (see, People v Clarke, 81 NY2d 777).

Viewed as a whole, the court’s charge was balanced and sufficiently conveyed the applicable principles of law to the jury (People v Russell, 266 NY 147,153). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cotto, 216 A.D.2d 123, 629 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 123 (People v. Cotto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Garcia
284 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)