People v. Correa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Correa

118 A.D.2d 651, 499 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54512

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 118 A.D.2d 651 (People v. Correa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Correa, 118 A.D.2d 651, 499 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moscowitz, J.), imposed October 2, 1984, upon his 1982 conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, entered upon a jury verdict. The resentence was imposed pursuant to an order of this court, dated July 2, 1984, which modified the judgment, on the law, by vacating the original sentence, and remitted the case to Criminal Term for resentencing (People v Correa, 103 AD2d 753).

Resentence affirmed.

The questions raised regarding the propriety of the defendant’s original conviction are not properly before us on appeal from the resentence (see, People v Manino, 90 AD2d 777). Moreover, these precise questions have already been considered and rejected by this court (People v Correa, 103 AD2d 753, supra). We find no impropriety with respect to the sentence imposed upon remand. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moscowitz, J.), imposed October 2, 1984, upon his 1982 conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, entered upon a jury verdict. The resentence was imposed pursuant to an order of this court, dated July 2, 1984, which modified the judgment, on the law, by vacating the original sentence, and remitted the case to Criminal Term for resentencing (People v Correa, 103 AD2d 753).

Resentence affirmed.

The questions raised regarding the propriety of the defendant’s original conviction are not properly before us on appeal from the resentence (see, People v Manino, 90 AD2d 777). Moreover, these precise questions have already been considered and rejected by this court (People v Correa, 103 AD2d 753, supra). We find no impropriety with respect to the sentence imposed upon remand. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.D.2d 651, 499 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-correa-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack