People v. Conway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Conway

140 A.D.3d 1185, 33 N.Y.S.3d 761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 2016

Docket2014-08606

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 140 A.D.3d 1185 (People v. Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Conway, 140 A.D.3d 1185, 33 N.Y.S.3d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered July 9, 2014, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). The defendant’s valid appeal waiver precludes the review of his challenges to the denial of his suppression motion (see People v Hicks, 134 AD3d 854, 854 [2015]), the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution for the charge of manslaughter in the second degree (see id. at 854), and the alleged excessiveness of the sentence imposed (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256).

Leventhal, J.P., Miller, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered July 9, 2014, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). The defendant’s valid appeal waiver precludes the review of his challenges to the denial of his suppression motion (see People v Hicks, 134 AD3d 854, 854 [2015]), the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution for the charge of manslaughter in the second degree (see id. at 854), and the alleged excessiveness of the sentence imposed (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256).

Leventhal, J.P., Miller, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D.3d 1185, 33 N.Y.S.3d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conway-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack