People v. Briggs

2018 NY Slip Op 5055
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 5, 2018
Docket2016-07899
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 5055 (People v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Briggs, 2018 NY Slip Op 5055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Briggs (2018 NY Slip Op 05055)
People v Briggs
2018 NY Slip Op 05055
Decided on July 5, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 5, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

2016-07899
2016-07900
(Ind. No. 1422-15, S.C.I. No. 564-16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Willie Briggs, appellant.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Timothy P. Finnerty of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (John J. Toomey, Jr., J.), both rendered June 27, 2016, convicting him of driving while intoxicated (two counts) and failing to stay in a designated lane under Indictment No. 1422-15, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under S.C.I. No. 564-16, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094; People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337). The defendant's valid appeal waiver precludes review of his excessive sentence claims (see People v Edwin L., 142 AD3d 718; People v Conway, 140 AD3d 1185).

MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Conway
140 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Edwin L.
142 A.D.3d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Bryant
68 N.E.3d 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 5055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-briggs-nyappdiv-2018.