People v. Conway
This text of 247 N.W.2d 317 (People v. Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
R. B. Burns, P. J.
Defendants were convicted by a jury of first-degree murder, contrary to MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548. They appeal and we reverse.
The trial judge instructed the jury in part:
"When a man assaults another with a deadly weapon, and a gun is a deadly weapon, in such a manner that the natural and ordinary probable use of such deadly weapon, in such a manner would take life, the law presumes that such a person so assaulting, intended to take life.”(Emphasis added.)
People v Martin, 392 Mich 553, 561; 221 NW2d 336, 340 (1974), followed in People v Lyles, 67 Mich App 620; 242 NW2d 452 (1976), clearly indicates such an instruction is error:
"The law does not imply malice where a deadly [631]*631weapon is used. Michigan has long ago considered malice a permissible inference to be drawn by the jury rather than a presumption of law.”
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 N.W.2d 317, 70 Mich. App. 629, 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conway-michctapp-1976.