People v. Conklin

26 A.D.3d 766, 807 N.Y.S.2d 912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Conklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 A.D.3d 698

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Herkimer County Court (Patrick L. Kirk, J), rendered December 20, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [2]). We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at the suppression court (Patrick L. Kirk, J.). We add only that the sentence is not un[767]*767duly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Green and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Conklin, 26 A.D.3d 766, 807 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

26 A.D.3d 766 (People v. Conklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 220.18
New York PEN § 220.18