People v. Conklin
This text of 26 A.D.3d 766 (People v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Herkimer County Court (Patrick L. Kirk, J), rendered December 20, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [2]). We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at the suppression court (Patrick L. Kirk, J.). We add only that the sentence is not un[767]*767duly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Green and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 766, 807 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conklin-nyappdiv-2006.