People v. Colon

2023 NY Slip Op 00498
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 2023
DocketInd No. 6022/09 Appeal No. 17237 Case No. 2018-2677
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 00498 (People v. Colon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Colon, 2023 NY Slip Op 00498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Colon (2023 NY Slip Op 00498)
People v Colon
2023 NY Slip Op 00498
Decided on February 02, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: February 02, 2023
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., González, Scarpulla, Shulman, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Ind No. 6022/09 Appeal No. 17237 Case No. 2018-2677

[*1]People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Francisco Colon, Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Katheryne M. Martone of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jennifer Covais of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), entered on or about June 5, 2018, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying series of sex crimes committed against a 10 year old child. Defendant's response to sex offender treatment, prison disciplinary record, and other evidence of rehabilitation were accounted for, and were not so exceptional as to warrant a departure under the totality of circumstances. Furthermore, we do not find that defendant's point score overassesses his threat to public safety (see e.g. People v Cabrera, 91 AD3d 479, 479 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 19 NY 801 [2012). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: February 2, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Colon
2023 NY Slip Op 00498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 00498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colon-nyappdiv-2023.