People v. Collier
113 A.D.3d 786, 978 N.Y.2d 875
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Collier. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 A.D.3d 1146 →
Opinion
Since the defendant had not yet completed the previously imposed terms of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to include the mandatory periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Rogers, 105 AD3d 776 [2013]; People v Dawkins, [787]*78787 AD3d 550 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Collier, 113 A.D.3d 786, 978 N.Y.2d 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 786 (People v. Collier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Dawkins
87 A.D.3d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Rogers
105 A.D.3d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)