Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Collier

People v. Collier

113 A.D.3d 786, 978 N.Y.2d 875
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D.3d 786 (People v. Collier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Collier, 113 A.D.3d 786, 978 N.Y.2d 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Since the defendant had not yet completed the previously imposed terms of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to include the mandatory periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Rogers, 105 AD3d 776 [2013]; People v Dawkins, [787]*78787 AD3d 550 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Dawkins
87 A.D.3d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Rogers
105 A.D.3d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 786, 978 N.Y.2d 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-collier-nyappdiv-2014.