People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Coleman

291 A.D.2d 662, 737 N.Y.S.2d 563, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1906

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 662 (People v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coleman, 291 A.D.2d 662, 737 N.Y.S.2d 563, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Cardona, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), rendered November 4, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny and criminal mischief in the fourth degree.

In our previous review of this matter (278 AD2d 523), we relieved defendant’s counsel after finding, contrary to his assertions, the existence of a nonfrivolous appealable issue and appointed new counsel “to address any and all appealable issues” (id. at 524).

In June 1998, a Columbia County Grand Jury charged defendant in a four-count indictment with burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal mischief in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree. [663]*663Following negotiations, defendant pleaded guilty to the first three counts and County Court noted that the fourth count of the indictment, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, would be “merge[d].” However, County Court sentenced defendant to a determinate term of 7V2 years in prison on the burglary charge, as well as a “concurrent period of incarceration under Counts 2, 3, and 4; Petit [L]arceny, Criminal Mischief in the Fourth Degree and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Fifth Degree, all class A misdemeanors, of one year concurrent with that to be served under Count 1.” As the People correctly concede, County Court inadvertently sentenced defendant on the fourth count in the absence of a conviction. We, therefore, vacate the illegal sentence imposed on that count (see, CPL 470.20; People v LaSalle, 95 NY2d 827, 829).

Upon this record and the totality of the circumstances, we find no merit to defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.

Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed on count 4 of the indictment charging criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Cardona, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), rendered November 4, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny and criminal mischief in the fourth degree.

In our previous review of this matter (278 AD2d 523), we relieved defendant’s counsel after finding, contrary to his assertions, the existence of a nonfrivolous appealable issue and appointed new counsel “to address any and all appealable issues” (id. at 524).

In June 1998, a Columbia County Grand Jury charged defendant in a four-count indictment with burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal mischief in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree. [663]*663Following negotiations, defendant pleaded guilty to the first three counts and County Court noted that the fourth count of the indictment, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, would be “merge[d].” However, County Court sentenced defendant to a determinate term of 7V2 years in prison on the burglary charge, as well as a “concurrent period of incarceration under Counts 2, 3, and 4; Petit [L]arceny, Criminal Mischief in the Fourth Degree and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Fifth Degree, all class A misdemeanors, of one year concurrent with that to be served under Count 1.” As the People correctly concede, County Court inadvertently sentenced defendant on the fourth count in the absence of a conviction. We, therefore, vacate the illegal sentence imposed on that count (see, CPL 470.20; People v LaSalle, 95 NY2d 827, 829).

Upon this record and the totality of the circumstances, we find no merit to defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.

Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed on count 4 of the indictment charging criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 662, 737 N.Y.S.2d 563, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coleman-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack