People v. Coleman
180 N.E.2d 265, 10 N.Y.2d 1008
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.Y.2d 765 →
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to the extent of stating that, on this motion for reargument, there was presented an alleged Federal question as to whether the rights of defendant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States were violated by the remarks of the prosecutor in summation. The Court of Appeals held that there was no such violation. [See 10 N Y 2d 765.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Coleman, 180 N.E.2d 265, 10 N.Y.2d 1008 (N.Y. 1961).
180 N.E.2d 265 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.