People v. Cohn

18 P. 410, 76 Cal. 386, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 897
California Supreme Court·Decided June 1, 1888·No. No. 20354·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

McKinstry, J.

The defendant asked the court to instruct the jury: “The burden is upon the prosecution of establishing every element of the crime of which the defendant may be convicted, beyond a reasonable doubt.” Through inadvertence, or for some reason which does not appear in the recórd, the court refused to give the instruction requested, and omitted to give any other instruction of a like character, or stating or bearing upon the rule as to reasonable doubt in criminal cases. De[387]*387fendant took proper exception to the refusal of the court to give the instruction requested.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Thornton, J., Sharpstein, J.,- McFarland, J., Searls, C. J., and Paterson, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cohn, 18 P. 410, 76 Cal. 386, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 897 (Cal. 1888).

18 P. 410 (People v. Cohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gentry
257 Cal. App. 2d 607 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
People v. Ramírez
50 P.R. 224 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1936)
Pueblo v. Ramírez
50 P.R. Dec. 234 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1936)
People v. Kelly
120 P. 46 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)