People v. Coffey

180 N.W.2d 220, 24 Mich. App. 283, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1696
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Coffey. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Mich. App. 602
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 1, 1970·No. Docket No. 7,417·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The people move to affirm defendant’s conviction, on plea of guilty, of unlawfully taking possession and driving away of a motor vehicle contrary to MCLA § 750.413 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.645). GCR 1963, 817.5 (3).

[284]*284On appeal, defendant argues that the court failed to examine defendant sufficiently in order to establish the crime and defendant’s participation therein. See People v. Barrows (1959), 358 Mich 267, 272; People v. Perine (1967), 7 Mich App 292. Specifically, defendant argues that the examination failed to disclose that he actually drove the vehicle away.

Our review of the record satisfies us that the court’s interrogation of defendant was adequate.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coffey, 180 N.W.2d 220, 24 Mich. App. 283, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

180 N.W.2d 220 (People v. Coffey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Perine
151 N.W.2d 876 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1967)
People v. Barrows
99 N.W.2d 347 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1959)