People v. Coffey

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Coffey

180 N.W.2d 220, 24 Mich. App. 283, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1696

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 1, 1970

DocketDocket No. 7,417

StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.W.2d 220 (People v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coffey, 180 N.W.2d 220, 24 Mich. App. 283, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The people move to affirm defendant’s conviction, on plea of guilty, of unlawfully taking possession and driving away of a motor vehicle contrary to MCLA § 750.413 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.645). GCR 1963, 817.5 (3).

[284]*284On appeal, defendant argues that the court failed to examine defendant sufficiently in order to establish the crime and defendant’s participation therein. See People v. Barrows (1959), 358 Mich 267, 272; People v. Perine (1967), 7 Mich App 292. Specifically, defendant argues that the examination failed to disclose that he actually drove the vehicle away.

Our review of the record satisfies us that the court’s interrogation of defendant was adequate.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI