People v. Clarke

293 A.D.2d 405, 740 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4060
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clarke. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 A.D.3d 807

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered December 9, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal contempt in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror who initially expressed difficulty in presuming a defendant innocent in a domestic violence case involving the violation of an order of protection. The court took appropriate corrective action (see, People v Bludson, 97 NY2d 644, 645-646) by promptly instructing the jury panel on the presumption of innocence, with specific reference to the particular panelist’s concerns, and by calling this panelist’s attention to her prior comments. The juror then gave an unequivocal assurance that she could follow these instructions.

Evidence of defendant’s prior bad acts against the victim was properly admitted to demonstrate his intent to commit the charged crime, and any prejudice was alleviated by the limiting instruction (see, People v Mehmeti, 279 AD2d 420, 421, lv denied 96 NY2d 832). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clarke, 293 A.D.2d 405, 740 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 405 (People v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bludson
761 N.E.2d 1016 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Mehmeti
279 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)