People v. Clarke

272 A.D.2d 78, 707 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clarke. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D.2d 7

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.), rendered November 7, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s charge requires preservation (see, People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467) and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the charge did not impose an affirmative obligation on any juror to articulate to the other jurors the basis for reasonable doubt or shift the burden of proof.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Tom, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clarke, 272 A.D.2d 78, 707 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 78 (People v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thomas
407 N.E.2d 430 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)