People v. Clark

265 A.D.2d 164, 696 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9696
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 A.D.2d 710

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered November 14, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 to 16 years and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s Sandoval ruling permitting limited inquiry as to similar crimes was an appropriate exercise of discretion, which balanced the proper factors (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 274-275).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 265 A.D.2d 164, 696 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 164 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)