People v. Clark

262 A.D.2d 655, 691 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7591
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 A.D.2d 710

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered September 4, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant has failed to preserve his remaining contentions for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to consider these contentions in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 262 A.D.2d 655, 691 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 655 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)