People v. Clark

114 A.D.2d 966, 495 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 A.D.2d 846

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), imposed July 15, 1983, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment of six years to life.

Sentence affirmed.

[967]*967Defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Under the circumstances of this case, defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 114 A.D.2d 966, 495 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

114 A.D.2d 966 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)