People v. Clark

106 A.D.2d 459, 482 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21494
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 A.D.2d 846

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), [460]*460rendered September 2, 1981, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

In light of the strength of the identification testimony and the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, there is no reasonable possibility that the admission of testimony regarding the showup, even if erroneous, contributed to his conviction (see People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Allen, 98 AD2d 973).

We have considered defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 106 A.D.2d 459, 482 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

106 A.D.2d 459 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Adams
423 N.E.2d 379 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Allen
98 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)