Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Celaj

People v. Celaj

808 N.E.2d 352, 1 N.Y.3d 588, 776 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 54
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 808 N.E.2d 352 (People v. Celaj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Celaj, 808 N.E.2d 352, 1 N.Y.3d 588, 776 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 54 (N.Y. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination of reasonable suspicion made by Supreme Court and affirmed by the Appellate Division involves a mixed question of law and fact which is supported by evidence in the record. Consequently, the issue is beyond further review by this Court.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Grapfeo and Read concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Torres
2024 NY Slip Op 04442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
In re Darryl C.
98 A.D.3d 69 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Allen
42 A.D.3d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Alston
23 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Moore
13 A.D.3d 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Bowens
9 A.D.3d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
808 N.E.2d 352, 1 N.Y.3d 588, 776 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-celaj-ny-2004.