People v. Celaj

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Celaj

808 N.E.2d 352, 1 N.Y.3d 588, 776 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 54

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 2004·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination of reasonable suspicion made by Supreme Court and affirmed by the Appellate Division involves a mixed question of law and fact which is supported by evidence in the record. Consequently, the issue is beyond further review by this Court.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Grapfeo and Read concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination of reasonable suspicion made by Supreme Court and affirmed by the Appellate Division involves a mixed question of law and fact which is supported by evidence in the record. Consequently, the issue is beyond further review by this Court.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Grapfeo and Read concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

People v. Celaj, 808 N.E.2d 352, 1 N.Y.3d 588, 776 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 54 (N.Y. 2004).

Pincite

808 N.E.2d 352 (People v. Celaj) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related