People v. Cazeau
107 A.D.3d 910, 966 N.Y.S.2d 868
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed February 25, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was exces[911]*911sive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Foster, 105 AD3d 1059 [2013]; People v Bradshaw, 105 AD3d 758 [2013]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Cazeau, 107 A.D.3d 910, 966 N.Y.S.2d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
107 A.D.3d 910 (People v. Cazeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
105 A.D.3d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Foster
105 A.D.3d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)