People v. Bradshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bradshaw

105 A.D.3d 758, 961 N.Y.S.2d 797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 105 A.D.3d 758 (People v. Bradshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bradshaw, 105 A.D.3d 758, 961 N.Y.S.2d 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colangelo, J.), rendered December 20, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the sentencing court failed to conduct a proper inquiry into his post-plea arrest before imposing an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Miles, 268 AD2d 489 [2000]). In any event, the sentencing court’s inquiry was proper (see generally People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 713 [1993]).

To the extent that the defendant contends that his sentence was excessive, that contention is precluded by the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).

Dillon, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI