People v. Catalano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Catalano

178 A.D.2d 962, 578 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 26, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 178 A.D.2d 962 (People v. Catalano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Catalano, 178 A.D.2d 962, 578 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of rape in the first degree is reversed, the sentence imposed thereon vacated, and that count of the indictment dismissed because "the complainant testified to more than one act of [rape], but defendant was indicted on only one count” (People v McNab, 167 AD2d 858).

In light of the overwhelming proof of guilt of the other offenses, any error in excluding certain testimony of the defense witness, DeMarco, was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242).

The other issues raised by defendant on appeal lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of rape in the first degree is reversed, the sentence imposed thereon vacated, and that count of the indictment dismissed because "the complainant testified to more than one act of [rape], but defendant was indicted on only one count” (People v McNab, 167 AD2d 858).

In light of the overwhelming proof of guilt of the other offenses, any error in excluding certain testimony of the defense witness, DeMarco, was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242).

The other issues raised by defendant on appeal lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 A.D.2d 962, 578 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-catalano-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack