People v. Castro

519 N.E.2d 614, 70 N.Y.2d 943, 524 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 4
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1988·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

"Whether a police officer has the requisite reasonable suspicion to believe a defendant had been, is then or is about to be engaged in conduct in violation of the law is generally a mixed question of law and fact which can rarely be resolved as a matter of law” (People v Chilton, 69 NY2d 928, 929; *945 People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470, 477-478). Inasmuch as there is evidence in the record to support the hearing court’s finding, undisturbed by the Appellate Division, that there was a sufficient predicate for the officer’s interference with defendant as he attempted to walk away from the taxi, our review process is at an end (People v Jones, 69 NY2d 853, 855).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castro, 519 N.E.2d 614, 70 N.Y.2d 943, 524 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 4 (N.Y. 1988).

519 N.E.2d 614 (People v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thomas
19 A.D.3d 32 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Murray
247 A.D.2d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Garvey
226 A.D.2d 193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Oliver
162 A.D.2d 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Falciglia
554 N.E.2d 1269 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)